Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to the ZMuSkim #20693

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017
Merged

Conversation

rvenditti
Copy link
Contributor

Change the ZMuSkim defintion in order to meet the need of Muons subsystems DPGs.
Main changes wrt to previous version are:
-definition of the "loose" leg to be an isolated track (not a muon as in the previous skim definition)
-apply tight muon ID on the "tight" leg and increase the value of the cut on pT
-apply additional selections on the dimuon candidate (on the dz(loose leg, tight leg), OS)

New selections have been presented (and blessed) in the muon pog meeting:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/666069/contributions/2722477/attachments/1525026/2384260/ZMUskim_CSC_proposal_Sep18.pdf

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20693/1037

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @rvenditti for master.

It involves the following packages:

DPGAnalysis/Skims

@cmsbuild, @kkousour, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Sep 28, 2017

please test workflow 136.730,136.787

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 28, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23309/console Started: 2017/09/28 18:58

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@drkovalskyi
Copy link
Contributor

This skim is not tested by Muon POG to satisfy the requirements that we agreed on. Please hold integration until we confirm that it's Ok to proceed.

@drkovalskyi
Copy link
Contributor

This skim is not tested by Muon POG to satisfy the requirements that we agreed on. Please hold integration until we confirm that it's Ok to proceed.

I have checked the implementation and found it reasonable. The rate of the new skim is equal to the rate of current skim. Please proceed with integration of the change.

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Oct 2, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@@ -1,44 +1,166 @@
import FWCore.ParameterSet.Config as cms

from Configuration.StandardSequences.MagneticField_cff import *
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @rvenditti - the magnetic field is set at a much higher level than within a skim. Please remove this.

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Oct 4, 2017

please test workflow 136.730,136.787

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23432/console Started: 2017/10/04 11:09

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20693/23432/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2761357
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 252
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2760918
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 187
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 107 log files, 10 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Oct 4, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a2aeaf0 into cms-sw:master Oct 10, 2017
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This appears to have broken step3 of workflow 1000.0 with the error

----- Begin Fatal Exception 11-Oct-2017 01:03:43 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=PATMuonProducer label='tightMuonsCandidateForZMuSkim'
Exception Message:
MissingParameter: Parameter 'recomputeBasicSelectors' not found.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------



###create the "tag collection" of muon candidate, embedding the relevant infos
tightMuonsCandidateForZMuSkim = cms.EDProducer("PATMuonProducer",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this has to be cloned and modified from a default config

@gpetruc
you noticed this issue in #20887

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 11, 2017

looks like an example of merging based on obsolete test results.

@rvenditti
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated my branch, do you want me to open a new PR?
https://github.com/rvenditti/cmssw/blob/ZMuSkim-2017update-CSCProposal/DPGAnalysis/Skims/python/ZMuSkim_cff.py

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

hi @rvenditti - yes please make a new PR. Thanks.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

i realized that I could do it - #20741.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants