-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ecal bad calib filter #20698
Ecal bad calib filter #20698
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20698/1051 Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20698/1051/git-diff.patch You can run |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
A new Pull Request was created by @dvannerom for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/PatAlgos @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+code-checks |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
std::cout << "Detid=" << eedet.rawId() | ||
<< " ix=" << ix << " iy=" << iy<< " iz=" << iz | ||
<< " energy=" << ene << " et=" << et << std::endl; | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this commented out code needed?
Please remove or add comments inline in the code why the commented out block is relevant
this applies to all of this PR
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Comparison Summary:
|
+1
I think that it should be safe to add this to 94X. |
Thank you @slava77 Yes we need it in 94X - we will prepare it today |
@gouskos : when you submit your pull request, set the base as 9_4_X, instead of keeping the default (which is always master) |
@perrotta Oh - yes - I am sorry . I am doing it now. So we can close the previous PR or I can change it on the fly ? |
merge |
Pull Request to add the EcalBadCalibFilter in the standard filters sequence