L1TOffline DQM - add efficiency flag to efficiency ME - 92x

[thomreis]

Add efficiency flag to L1T offline DQM efficiency ME to avoid plots being normalised in the GUI.

[thomreis]

backport of #20923

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for CMSSW_9_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/L1Trigger

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@kreczko, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from L1TOffline DQM - add efficiency flag to efficiency ME #20923

[rekovic]

please test

[rekovic]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23779/console Started: 2017/10/16 10:12

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5c38e2e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20924/23779/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
d3aae47
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20924/23779/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20924/23779/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20924/23779/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1978338
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14535
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1963631
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 172
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• Checked 94 log files, 9 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

[dmitrijus]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[davidlange6]

+1