Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added ResonanceDecayFilter:wzAsEquivalent setting to Pythia8Interface. #21132

Merged

Conversation

acarvalh
Copy link

@acarvalh acarvalh commented Nov 2, 2017

To decay H inclusivelly to a pair of gauge bosons
@kandrosov

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2017

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

perrozzi commented Nov 2, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2017

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21132/1763

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21132/1763/git-diff.patch
e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21132/1763/git-diff.patch | patch -p1

You can run scram build code-checks to apply code checks directly

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

perrozzi commented Nov 2, 2017

@acarvalh please apply the patch suggested above

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2017

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2017

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21132/1764

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @acarvalh (acarvalh) for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/Pythia8Interface

@cmsbuild, @efeyazgan, @perrozzi, @thuer, @govoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here


int mid = p.mother1()>0 ? std::abs(process[p.mother1()].id()) : 0;

//if no list of mothers is provided, then all particles
//in hard process and resonance decays are counted together
bool validMother = mothers_.size() ? false : true;
bool validMother = mothers_.empty();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you sure you have not inverted the logic here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(probably not, just make sure)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@perozzi yes, I'm sure: !size() = empt().

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @acarvalh - if this line is correct, then the loop just below is not needed. perhaps it should really be
bool validMother=false?[in fact the declaration of validMother can be avoided trivially]

@acarvalh
Copy link
Author

acarvalh commented Nov 8, 2017

Dear all
Is there an prevision to when this is going to be merged?
Also, to which release we need to do the backport in order it to be included in the current prod?

thank you

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

perrozzi commented Nov 8, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24271/console Started: 2017/11/08 13:06

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21132/1886

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

Pull request #21132 was updated. @cmsbuild, @efeyazgan, @perrozzi, @thuer, @govoni can you please check and sign again.

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

perrozzi commented Nov 9, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24326/console Started: 2017/11/09 18:08

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21132/24326/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
10042.0 step 5
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2909863
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2909684
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 178
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram bins added: 0.0 ( 23 files compared)
  • Checked 111 log files, 8 edm output root files, 27 DQM output files

@perrozzi
Copy link
Contributor

perrozzi commented Nov 9, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants