New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added protection for invalid GhostTrackStates (94X) #21143
Added protection for invalid GhostTrackStates (94X) #21143
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek (Dinko Ferencek) for CMSSW_9_4_X. It involves the following packages: RecoVertex/GhostTrackFitter @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Would it make sense to also backport to 92X? |
Given that the original report of this issue
(https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3574.html) was
referring to 92X, I would say yes...
Dinko Ferencek <notifications@github.com> ha scritto:
… Would it make sense to also backport to 92X?
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#21143 (comment)
|
merge |
Backport of #21120