New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GT Updates : PhaseII GT updated with the new Jet Energy Corrections #21370
GT Updates : PhaseII GT updated with the new Jet Energy Corrections #21370
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @arunhep (Arun Kumar) for CMSSW_9_3_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/AlCa @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
attn @kpedro88 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 6eaa636 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/20034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D17_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D17+RecoFullGlobal_2023D17+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D17/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D17_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D17+RecoFullGlobal_2023D17+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D17.log20434.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/20434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D19_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D19+RecoFullGlobal_2023D19+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D19/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D19_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D19+RecoFullGlobal_2023D19+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D19.log The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
@kpedro88
|
@aperloff have you seen this error before? |
Yes, I have. It means that the L2L3Residual payload is missing from the GT (https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/CondFormats/JetMETObjects/interface/JetCorrectorParameters.h#L141). Are you running on MC? The MC workflows might have that turned on because what we normally do is put in a placeholder for the L2L3Residuals which just returns a multiplicative factor of 1. It's not as s safe a workflow, but for normal JECs it works just fine. Still, I'm surprised an official workflow would take that chance. I didn't put in the dummy files for L2L3 since that hasn't, in the past, been necessary for PhaseII. Do I need to recreate the GT and re-upload? |
@aperloff from the exception message, it looks like this is something for MET. Probably it doesn't need it, but if it's straightforward to remake the JEC records with dummy residual corrections, that would probably be faster than trying to debug the miniAOD configs. |
Okay, I think this is actually a prefetching issue similar to #20057 - the product of |
@arunhep @kpedro88 I have made the new tags and uploaded them to both the production and prep databases. They are: |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@kpedro88 done ! |
Yes, this was much more tedious than I expected. I will consider posting an issue for the MET code to add some triggers so unneeded/dummy JECs can be avoided in the future. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@kpedro88 @aperloff can you validate the changes observed in PhaseII workflows because of these changes in JECs? once you give me green light, I will sign this PR. |
To me, the changes look consistent with the application of better JECs. |
@arunhep please sign |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
hi all |
here you go : #21647 |
+1 |
Summary of changes in Global Tags
Upgrade