Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate to concurrent DQM #21766

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2018
Merged

migrate to concurrent DQM #21766

merged 1 commit into from Jan 17, 2018

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Dec 21, 2017

No description provided.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Dec 21, 2017

An alternative implementation of #21764, for reference.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Dec 21, 2017

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/RecoB

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@swertz, @imarches, @acaudron, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @mverzett, @ferencek, @pvmulder, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21766 was updated. @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please check and sign again.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Dec 21, 2017

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21766/25250/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins-workarea/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21766/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2773742
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2773572
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.580000000096 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Jan 15, 2018

I understand that @VinInn is OK with these changes.

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, could please sign or comment ?

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6de20cc into cms-sw:master Jan 17, 2018
@fwyzard fwyzard deleted the alternate_21764 branch January 17, 2018 12:25
@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is causing a crash in the IBs.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/buildlogs/slc6_amd64_gcc630/CMSSW_10_0_X_2018-01-17-1100/pyRelValMatrixLogs/run/5.4_ZEE+ZEEFS+HARVESTFS/step1_ZEE+ZEEFS+HARVESTFS.log

The problem is DTSegment2DSLPhiQuality is a legacy EDAnalyzer which does NOT inherit from DQMEDAnalyzer. The module is calling directly into the DQMStore at global begin Run and happens to do it at the exact same time as PrimaryVertexMonitor.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

DTSegment2DSLPhiQuality did not cause a problem previously because the DQMEDAnalyzers were all stream modules so they filled their histograms at streamBeginRun and streamBeginLuminosityBlock which happen after their global counterparts.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard @Dr15Jones given that we need to converge for pre4, I will revert the PR in case we do not have quickly a fix

@VinInn
Copy link
Contributor

VinInn commented Jan 18, 2018

Do I understand correctly that before any module is migrated to the new concurrent DQM DTSegment2DSLPhiQuality need to be fixed (as well as any other module operating in the same way)?
@kmaeshima, @dmitrijus please take note

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

Reverting this PR will not solve the issue...

I will migrate/disable DTSegment2DSLPhiQuality later today.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Jan 18, 2018

Do I understand correctly that before any module is migrated to the new concurrent DQM DTSegment2DSLPhiQuality need to be fixed (as well as any other module operating in the same way)?

Correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants