[New GT][2018 realistic and cosmic realistic] 2018 GEM,HCAL geom + ECAL thresholds for 2018 #21854
Conversation
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-21854/2888 |
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @lpernie (Luca Pernie) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/AlCa @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
Comparison job queued. |
|
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
cmsbuild
added
code-checks-pending
comparison-pending
and removed
code-checks-approved
comparison-available
tests-approved
labels
|
In the Unit tests I see: Maybe a glitch? I will submit tests again |
|
please test |
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
Comparison job queued. |
|
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
|
+1 |
cmsbuild
added
alca-approved
fully-signed
and removed
alca-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
adding @amassiro
The ECAL changes in the global tag are unrelated to the reco PR.
The updates in the GT are related to noise, transparency loss and DAQ
thresholds for 2018. The updates in reco are related to rechits and
clustering thresholds.
…On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Fabio Cossutti ***@***.***> wrote:
@lpernie <https://github.com/lpernie> (and @deguio
<https://github.com/deguio> @crovelli <https://github.com/crovelli> ) Is
there any dependency between this tag and the pending PRs for HCAL and
ECAL? At latest ORP I understood that the affected geometry will be the
reco one (so GEN-SIM will be unaffected), is it correct? And I see other
parameters affected (e.g. ECAL thresholds...)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#21854 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEhG3WVp_Vpj7ojm4y1OLiWW1jhvN215ks5tLgfxgaJpZM4Retv9>
.
|
|
Federico, the main goal is collapsed 2018 HE for HLT, right?
…On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Federico De Guio wrote:
Hi @fabiocos
correct. for hcal the affected geometry will be the reco one. this GT makes
possible to run the collapsed 2018 scenario using #21842
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the
thread.[AEx02hQ7PL0vbVnUW6yBoAvOR8OjnJLIks5tLhT6gaJpZM4Retv9.gif]
|
|
yes. and the collapsed 2018 validation with pre4 |
|
+1 |
CHANGES:
2018 realistic: 100X_upgrade2018_realistic_v6
Diff with old GT:
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/100X_upgrade2018_realistic_v6/100X_upgrade2018_realistic_v4
-> 2018 GEM and HCAL geom. + New ECAL thresholds
2018 realistic cosmics: 100X_upgrade2018cosmics_realistic_deco_v5
Diff with old GT:
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/100X_upgrade2018cosmics_realistic_deco_v5/100X_upgrade2018cosmics_realistic_deco_v3
-> 2018 GEM and HCAL geom. + New ECAL thresholds + HCAL Channel Quality, LUTCorrs. RespCorrs, ZSThresholds, QIEData
2018 ideal: 100X_upgrade2018_design_IdealBS_v4
Diff with old GT:
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/100X_upgrade2018_design_IdealBS_v4/100X_upgrade2018_design_IdealBS_v3
-> 2018 GEM and HCAL geom. + HCAL Channel Quality, LUTCorrs. RespCorrs, ZSThresholds, QIEData
NOTES:
. The new conditions will be signed off during the PPD meeting on Jan 18