Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CalibMuon/CSCCalibration: Change return type of ESProducer::produce methods to unique_ptr or shared_ptr. #21910

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Feb 3, 2018
Merged

CalibMuon/CSCCalibration: Change return type of ESProducer::produce methods to unique_ptr or shared_ptr. #21910

merged 9 commits into from Feb 3, 2018

Conversation

gartung
Copy link
Member

@gartung gartung commented Jan 22, 2018

In preparation for a move to multi IOV events in parallel, the return type of ESProducer::produce mehtods must be changed to unique_ptr or shared_ptr. These ptrs should not refer to member data. Rather they should refer to new(copied) objects.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@gartung
Copy link
Member Author

gartung commented Jan 22, 2018

@Dr15Jones

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ class CSCFakeCrosstalkConditions: public edm::ESProducer, public edm::EventSetup

void prefillCrosstalk();

typedef const CSCcrosstalk * ReturnType;
typedef std::unique_ptr<CSCcrosstalk>ReturnType;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add a space

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 22, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25554/console Started: 2018/01/22 18:47

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @gartung (Patrick Gartung) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibMuon/CSCCalibration

@ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ptcox, @ghellwig, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21910 was updated. @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21910 was updated. @ghellwig, @arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @lpernie can you please check and sign again.

@ghellwig
Copy link

ghellwig commented Feb 1, 2018

please test

@ghellwig
Copy link

ghellwig commented Feb 1, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25828/console Started: 2018/02/01 09:00

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21910/25828/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21910/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2465763
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2465593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.570000000123 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Feb 3, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f0fcf65 into cms-sw:master Feb 3, 2018
@gartung gartung deleted the CalibMuon-CSCCalibration-returntype-fix branch February 7, 2018 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants