Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

standardize implementation and offsets for special tracking workflows #21932

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 6, 2018

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88 kpedro88 commented Jan 23, 2018

In #18503 I tried to standardize the implementation of "special" workflows, but only propagated this to Phase2, ignoring Phase1.

This led to some offset numbers being used inconsistently between Phase1 and Phase2, as well as novel code in relval_2017 (which I would prefer to keep as a strict forwarding file to pass workflow numbers between the upgrade matrix and regular matrix).

I've moved all the special tracking workflows from relval_2017 into the new approach (all definitions/conditions in upgradeWorkflowComponents, relval_steps, and relval_upgrade). I checked the cmsDriver commands before and after the change using runTheMatrix.py --dryRun to make sure nothing was unintentionally altered.

In the process, I fixed a bug that the 2018 tracking workflows were actually using 2017 steps. I also changed the offset numbers for the Phase 2 timing and neutron workflows to be separate from the tracking workflows.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@makortel please take a look

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @prebello, @kpedro88, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @ebrondol, @ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 23, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25582/console Started: 2018/01/23 20:46

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please abort

1 similar comment
@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please abort

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins tests are aborted.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21932 was updated. @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @prebello, @kpedro88, @fabozzi can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 23, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25583/console Started: 2018/01/23 20:52

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21932/25583/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-21932/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2467599
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2467429
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.0999999999 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

kpedro88 commented Feb 4, 2018

@makortel ping

@fabozzi
Copy link
Contributor

fabozzi commented Feb 5, 2018

+1

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

makortel commented Feb 5, 2018

@kpedro88 Sorry for the delay. Looks good to me (as far as I could understand by just reading). Thanks for the generalization.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

kpedro88 commented Feb 5, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Feb 6, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 76bdfb5 into cms-sw:master Feb 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants