Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only HCAL HT versions 0 and 1 should be considered valid #22096

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 11, 2018

Conversation

christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

Only HCAL HT trigger channel versions 0 and 1 should be considered valid. Currently versions 1 to 7 are considered equivalent, which could lead to problems if a version 2 is ever introduced.

This PR should have no effect on any standard workflow. The only effect expected is that the hardcoded conditions, which are also used to generate database input files (i.e. with [1]), will now be generated with the correct version number for HT channels corresponding to HF (version 1 rather than 7). The correct behavior of this PR has been verified for with [1].

[1] cmsRun $CMSSW_RELEASE_BASE/src/CondTools/Hcal/test/runDumpHcalCond_cfg.py dumplist="LutMetadata" usehardcode=True run=999999 geometry=Extended2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 2, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 2, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 2, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @christopheralanwest for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/CaloTopology

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 5, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/25897/console Started: 2018/02/05 09:50

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22096/25897/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-22096/1325.7_TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+TTbar_13_94XNanoAODINPUT+NANOEDMMC2017

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2465763
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2465593
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 169
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.12000000011 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Feb 9, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 9, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7f50efb into cms-sw:master Feb 11, 2018
@christopheralanwest christopheralanwest deleted the hcal-fix-validHT branch August 21, 2019 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants