New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
92X-tuned electron ID and removing upper bound for Zmass #22295
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-22295/3497 |
A new Pull Request was created by @taroni (Silvia Taroni) for master. It involves the following packages: DPGAnalysis/Skims @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @prebello, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
adding Nancy @nancymarinelli |
please test workflow 136.781,136.829 |
@kfjack FYI |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
please test workflow 136.781 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@taroni |
The output is ok. Thanks |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
92X tuned electron ID and no upper bound for Z Mass in the ZElectron skim used by ecal DPG
Presented at MoCa meeting on 21st February 2018. https://indico.cern.ch/event/699197/contributions/2900013/attachments/1604361/2544765/Zee.pdf
For CMSSW_10_1_X
@amassiro @crovelli @bmarzocc