Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating MET Significance Parameters with 80X Run2016 tune #22347

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 10, 2018

Conversation

danbarto
Copy link
Contributor

Updating the parameters for MET Significance with the latest tune (as used in JME-17-001).

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 26, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @danbarto (Daniel) for CMSSW_9_4_MAOD_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoMET/METProducers

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @ahinzmann, @mmarionncern, @jdamgov, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #22315

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Mar 2, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 2, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26438/console Started: 2018/03/02 14:40

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 2, 2018

-1

Tested at: 6827a83

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22347/26438/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: AddOn

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 2, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Mar 2, 2018

please test
(the usual glitch with no indication about which AddOn test failed?)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 2, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26463/console Started: 2018/03/02 20:29

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 3, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 3, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Mar 8, 2018

With a grep in the release I can find a possible example in RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers/python/reducedEgamma_cfi.py

In your case, you can restore the previous values of the parameters, and then replace the new ones as, e.g.:

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy_cff import run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy
#Run II MC, based on 80X
run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy.toModify(METSignificanceParams,
   jpar = cms.vdouble(1.39,1.26,1.21,1.23,1.28),
   pjpar = cms.vdouble(-0.2586,0.6173)
)
#Run II data, based on 80X
run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy.toModify(METSignificanceParams_Data,
   jpar = cms.vdouble(1.38,1.28,1.22,1.16,1.10),
   pjpar = cms.vdouble(0.0033,0.5802)
)
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run2_miniAOD_94XFall17_cff import run2_miniAOD_94XFall17
#Run II MC, based on 80X
run2_miniAOD_94XFall17.toModify(METSignificanceParams,
   jpar = cms.vdouble(1.39,1.26,1.21,1.23,1.28),
   pjpar = cms.vdouble(-0.2586,0.6173)
)
#Run II data, based on 80X
run2_miniAOD_94XFall17.toModify(METSignificanceParams_Data,
   jpar = cms.vdouble(1.38,1.28,1.22,1.16,1.10),
   pjpar = cms.vdouble(0.0033,0.5802)
)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Mar 8, 2018

the following will be more compact and will avoid unnecessary copy-paste

from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy_cff import run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy
from Configuration.Eras.Modifier_run2_miniAOD_94XFall17_cff import run2_miniAOD_94XFall17

for mod in [ run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy, run2_miniAOD_94XFall17]:
    mod.toModify(METSignificanceParams, 
                             jpar = [1.39,1.26,1.21,1.23,1.28],
                             pjpar = [-0.2586,0.6173])

@slava77 slava77 mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2018
15 tasks
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2018

Pull request #22347 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Mar 9, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26735/console Started: 2018/03/09 18:03

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22347/26735/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2721493
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 104
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2721227
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 162
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0 KiB( 0 files compared)
  • Checked 110 log files, 9 edm output root files, 27 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • MET significance parameters updated in miniAOD following the latest prescriptions of the MET group
  • The difference wrt the same PR now merged in the master is that in this 94X backport the updates are only allowed in the run2_miniAOD_80XLegacy and run2_miniAOD_94XFall17
  • The jenkns tests cerify that the modifications only appears in those eras

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_4_MAOD_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit a2f8135 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_4_MAOD_X Mar 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants