Steering scripts for O2Os

[ggovi]

Added scripts for o2o steering in offline and online environments.
Includes the version currently deployed.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[ggovi]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-22798/4174

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/27193/console Started: 2018/03/29 16:47

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/Utilities

@ggovi, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5fb1804
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22798/27193/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22798/27193/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2501822
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2501645
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.11000000002 KiB( 23 files compared)
• Checked 119 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@ggovi just a question, would not be better to have this tree under the scripts subdirectory?

[fabiocos]

@ggovi this could be considered afterwards, please let me know what you think anyway

[fabiocos]

+1

[fabiocos]

@ggovi late comment (as in 10_1_X review): in your scripts 10_0_5 is mentioned, is this intended? These are standalone new scripts so I do not see how they could break existing workflows, but I would like to be sure that they are what is really needed...