Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport fixes for simulation of long lived exotics #23310

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jun 22, 2018

Conversation

civanch
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch civanch commented May 24, 2018

This is a back-port of developments/fixes accumulated in 10_2 for simulation of long-lived exotic particles. This update is needed for the multi-threaded mode and for cases when long lived SUSY particle decay outside vacuum chamber.

Some modifications triggered by code-checks are also back-ported.

Mainstream production will not be affected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for CMSSW_9_3_X.

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/CustomPhysics

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #23310 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented May 24, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 24, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28160/console Started: 2018/05/24 15:52

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #23310 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 2f4d290

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23310/28160/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: Build

  • Build:

I found an error when building:

>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/CustomParticleFactory.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/DummyChargeFlipProcess.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/FullModelHadronicProcess.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/CMSDarkPairProduction.cc 
In file included from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/FullModelHadronicProcess.cc:6:0:
/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/poison/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/interface/G4ProcessHelper.hh:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
 #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
  ^~~~~
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/CustomPhysics.cc 
/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/FullModelHadronicProcess.cc: In member function 'virtual G4bool FullModelHadronicProcess::IsApplicable(const G4ParticleDefinition&)':
/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/CMSSW_9_3_X_2018-05-20-0000/src/SimG4Core/CustomPhysics/src/FullModelHadronicProcess.cc:23:19: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class G4ProcessHelper'


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

does this need to be tested with an external update?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #23310 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented May 24, 2018

@kpedro88 , no, external update is not needed. This type of simulation simply become not possible with multi-threaded mode.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented May 24, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 24, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28166/console Started: 2018/05/24 18:17

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23310/28166/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 25
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2624448
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 220
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2624051
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 177
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -24 KiB( 24 files compared)
  • Checked 105 log files, 8 edm output root files, 25 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Jun 5, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 5, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos, @kpedro88 (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Jun 9, 2018

@kpedro88 , @fabiocos , Brian confirm, that this PR is find for them but not urgent. So, please, merge it at the next occasion. They also ask if the same backport should be done for 9_4?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Jun 9, 2018

I don't think 9_4_X is used for any MC.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f3d7291 into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_3_X Jun 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants