New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BE5DPixel10 geometry fixes for SLHC8 #2352
BE5DPixel10 geometry fixes for SLHC8 #2352
Conversation
…anges in hcal geometry between slhc6 and slhc7 - now the be5dpixel10 geometry will run gen-sim
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 for CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC. BE5DPixel10 geometry fixes for SLHC8 It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @Degano, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @andersonjacob, @mark-grimes can you please take care of it? |
This one passes the upgrade tests with only the currently documented failures. |
merge Tests 3300, 3400, 4100, 4400, 40001, 50002, 60002, 4502, 4500, 5001 and 15001 all pass; as does 3400 with combinedCustoms.cust_2019WithGem. |
…calChanges BE5DPixel10 geometry fixes for SLHC8
P.S. I also tested with the command below and it worked fine.
|
P.P.S. When I say it worked fine, it runs without crashing. There are a few of these error messages printed before the first event:
Don't know if that's an issue. |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
spec files added for tinyxml external
changes needed to make be5d and be5dpixel10 consistent again given changes in hcal geometry between slhc6 and slhc7 - now the be5dpixel10 geometry will run gen-sim