New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New ETL geometry with 11 rings based on engineering drawings, add approximate support plate #23603
Conversation
…roximate support plate
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-23603/5212 |
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/MTDCommonData The following packages do not have a category, yet: Geometry/MTDCommonData @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
real tests should be done using PhaseII scenarios D24 and D25 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
assign geometry @smuzaffar apparently I missed to updated the bot for the addition of these packages back in #23126, to be fixed |
New categories assigned: geometry @Dr15Jones,@mdhildreth,@ianna,@civanch you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 |
@kpedro88 FYI, this is affecting PhaseII geometry |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
assign upgrade |
New categories assigned: upgrade @kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
The ETL geometry is updated according to specifications by @lgray from FNAL engineers. The rings have been updated from 9 to 11, and the positions are now according to the provided spreadsheet.
An approximate description of the aluminum support plate is also added, with a 6 mm thick plate between rings and a restricted 3.4 mm plate within rings, in the space in between front and rear modules. The services description in tkLayout has not been modified. The module size now used in 95 x 49 mm.
The numbering scheme code has been adapted accordingly.
The ETL geometry remains free from overlaps (tested with Geant4 code), and the numbering scheme has been reverified with the test code. According to the Geant4 dump of SD positions, the ETL module are correctly placed.