Backport PR #23578 to 10_1_X [Add code/configs for monitoring the new HLT_Photon35_TwoProngs35_v* paths]]

[covarell]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @covarell (Roberto Covarelli) for CMSSW_10_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/Trigger

@vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@battibass, @mtosi, @jhgoh, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @drkovalskyi, @trocino, @folguera, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add code/configs for monitoring the new HLT_Photon35_TwoProngs35_v* paths #23578

[covarell]

As asked by HIG trigger contacts

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/28858/console Started: 2018/06/25 10:12

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: e3ce6c9
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23643/28858/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23643/28858/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2523351
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2523174
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 408.65 KiB( 28 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10824.0,... ): 40.865 KiB HLT/Higgs
• Checked 119 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

[dmitrijus]

backport of #23578

[dmitrijus]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[covarell]

Any news about merging this? Thanks

[boudoul]

PLease @covarell , make an explicit title , otherwise we can't easily guess form the title what you are backporting

[fabiocos]

+1

not giving problems in CMSSW_10_2_0_pre6