proxy forwarding for PV and Z->mumu validations

[hroskes]

backport of #23761

Simple bugfix. I covered most of the validations we run in 84974aa, but missed setting the env variable in these two cases.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @hroskes (Heshy Roskes) for CMSSW_10_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation

@arunhep, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @pohsun, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @mmusich, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from proxy forwarding for PV and Z->mumu validations #23761

[hroskes]

type bug-fix

[pohsun]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/29099/console Started: 2018/07/12 18:59

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 095309c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23762/29099/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-23762/29099/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2523451
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2523274
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 28 files compared)
• Checked 119 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

[pohsun]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@hroskes @pohsun is this PR still needed, or could be closed, as Tier0 has moved to 10_2_X?

[hroskes]

@fabiocos Tier 0 isn't really relevant for us because we run on past samples. On the other hand, I don't think we have any alignment related samples in 101X so I'm ok to close it.