New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable IMT for merging of NanoAOD. #24508
Disable IMT for merging of NanoAOD. #24508
Conversation
As documented in CMSCOMPPR-3348, IMT triggers a crash in ROOT due to the fact that NanoAOD adds branches to the tree. This patch is a simple workaround - we disable IMT for the merge jobs (which are single core anyway) - until the ROOT issue is resolved.
A new Pull Request was created by @bbockelm (Brian Bockelman) for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/DataProcessing @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
I think you can create the same PR on the master branch from the very same branch (I assume the usual policy apply for master vs stable branches, so the master PR is needed) |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+operations the DataProcessing merge test output shows modifications consistent with the proposed change |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
As documented in CMSCOMPPR-3348, IMT triggers a crash in ROOT due to the fact that NanoAOD adds branches to the tree. This patch is a simple workaround - we disable IMT for the merge jobs (which are single core anyway) - until the ROOT issue is resolved.
I tested this by performing:
and hand-inspecting the resulting python.