add 3 production workflows for premix2018

[zhenhu]

No description provided.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24583/6471

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @zhenhu (Zhen Hu) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[zhenhu]

please test workflow 250200.118,250202.118,250206.118

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30488/console Started: 2018/09/18 18:05

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 2d58980
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24583/30488/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24583/30488/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-24583/250200.118_ProdZEE_13_pmx25ns+ProdZEE_13UP18+DIGIPRMXUP18_PROD_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18PROD_PU25+NANOEDMMC2018_PROD
• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-24583/250206.118_ProdZMM_13_pmx25ns+ProdZMM_13UP18+DIGIPRMXUP18_PROD_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18PROD_PU25+NANOEDMMC2018_PROD

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3146746
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3146548
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[kpedro88]

+upgrade

[zhenhu]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[fabiocos]

@zhenhu is DQM excluded on purpose from these workflows? Could you please clarify why for my understanding?

[prebello]

@fabiocos
my few percent: these are MC production workflows, aimed to mimic exactly the cmsdrivers of MccM campaigns . Therefore no DQM/harvesting outputs are applied.

[fabiocos]

@prebello thanks, so I understand that what is being tested is 1) functionality of the workflow and 2) check of the log files

[prebello]

@fabiocos yes. The content of MiniAOD and NanoAOD outputs would be checked, when necessary, by the POGs and PAGs as well. Otherwise it would be a copy of the usual relvals as well as unfriendly to computing resources.

[fabiocos]

+1