Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ecal Transparency corrections : use either a tag or a file for TPG #24603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 11, 2018

Conversation

depasse
Copy link
Contributor

@depasse depasse commented Sep 20, 2018

When building Ecal TPG parameters, allows to use either a file or a tag for the Transparency corrections (before, only files were allowed)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @depasse for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibCalorimetry/EcalTPGTools

@cmsbuild, @tocheng, @nsmith-, @rekovic, @franzoni, @thomreis, @pohsun, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

thomreis commented Oct 1, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30806/console Started: 2018/10/01 09:01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24603/30806/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3162800
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162601
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@lpernie
Copy link
Contributor

lpernie commented Oct 2, 2018

+1

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

thomreis commented Oct 2, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar modified the milestones: CMSSW_10_3_X, CMSSW_10_4_X Oct 10, 2018
edm::LogInfo("TopInfo") << ss.str();
ss.str("");
} // file
else { // Jean 2018
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@depasse as far as I understand, this option is so far dummy, and just activated in the test configurationa dded to this PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a new feature very convenient to be able to upload payloads
from sqlite files without the need to convert them to xml or txt ones.
It is neither dummy nor for test only.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@depasse I mean that so far there is no configuration activating it in production. Do you confirm?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it is not triggered in production. It is in EcalTPG"Tools" and will be used in the future ponctually. It is important to keep the traceability of this.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit fc1ef1a into cms-sw:master Oct 11, 2018
@depasse depasse deleted the EcalTPGParam_tag branch January 11, 2023 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants