Remove workflow 136.7321

[fabiocos]

Test workflow 136.7321 is conflicting with existing L1 emulation for DQM, as defined in #24578 .
It is the only workflow in PyReleaseValidation where the L1repack sequence is run in the RECO+DQM step, and not only in the HLT one. As L1T brings a partial L1 emulation in the DQM sequence, the two collide and gives a Schedule configuration exception.

As 1) PdmV claims that this workflow was used for a limited period in Summer 2016 and never asked fo production after that, and 2) L1T experts do not see any utility in it, I propose to simply remove it.

Further expansion of use of the L1 emulator for DQM should anyway drive IMO to consider adding the L1 item in the RECO+DQM step, to transparently manage the L1 emulation without ad hoc addition of pieces.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-24799/6745

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[fabiocos]

@davidlange6 apparently nobody recalls why this workflow might still be useful
@rekovic @thomreis this is what we have discussed
@Martin-Grunewald @slava77 @perrotta any objection on your side?

[fabiocos]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30885/console Started: 2018/10/04 11:10

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: de1ae4c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24799/30885/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-24799/30885/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3162909
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162711
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
• Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

[Martin-Grunewald]

No objections!

[fabiocos]

@prebello @pgunnell @zhenhu @kpedro88 could you please check? This is needed in order to clean the IB failure (not a big issue in itself, but annoying)

[prebello]

+1

[fabiocos]

+1

[fabiocos]

merge

@kpedro88 this workflow is anyway for the past, not connected with upgrade

[kpedro88]

+upgrade
(post facto)

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.