New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed JetMET summary plot for HI DQM #25034
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @jusaviin (Jussi Viinikainen) for CMSSW_10_3_X. It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/JetMET @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
backport of #24993 |
meJetPhi[1] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Phi_EndCap"); | ||
meJetPhi[2] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Phi_Forward"); | ||
meJetPhi[3] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"CaloJets/Phi"); | ||
//meJetPhi[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Phi"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this removable?
//meJetPhi[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Phi"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd guess so. That is the pp part of the code that I did not touch in this commit (except by moving it inside the else block).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is a backport of #24993 and that PR is already merged to master, I would prefer not to remove these commented out parts of code here either for consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jusaviin Please double check nothing is broken in the repo history by removing them, and if so. I'd suggest to remove them. So we can keep the code cleaner :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked that those lines have been commented out sometime in 2014. Most likely not needed ever again. I removed the lines and committed the update.
meJetEta[1] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Eta"); | ||
meJetEta[2] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/EtaFirst"); | ||
meJetEta[3] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"CaloJets/Eta"); | ||
//meJetEta[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Eta"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this removable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd guess so. That is the pp part of the code that I did not touch in this commit (except by moving it inside the else block).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is a backport of #24993 and that PR is already merged to master, I would prefer not to remove these commented out parts of code here either for consistency.
backport of #24993 |
Pull request #25034 was updated. @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport #24993 to 10_3_X.
Connected histograms from HIJetValidation to the JetMET summary plot in case of pp_on_AA_2018 era. The JetMET summary plot was by default reading the pp histograms, which are disabled for HI. To give green light for jets in the summary plot, it is required that the mean pT is lower than 50 GeV. Also show "Not set" instead of "Bad" for blocks that are not connected for HI.