Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed JetMET summary plot for HI DQM #25034

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 9, 2018

Conversation

jusaviin
Copy link

Backport #24993 to 10_3_X.

Connected histograms from HIJetValidation to the JetMET summary plot in case of pp_on_AA_2018 era. The JetMET summary plot was by default reading the pp histograms, which are disabled for HI. To give green light for jets in the summary plot, it is required that the mean pT is lower than 50 GeV. Also show "Not set" instead of "Bad" for blocks that are not connected for HI.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 29, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @jusaviin (Jussi Viinikainen) for CMSSW_10_3_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQMOffline/JetMET

@kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @ahinzmann, @rappoccio, @mmarionncern, @jdamgov, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @seemasharmafnal, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@andrius-k
Copy link

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 29, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31333/console Started: 2018/10/29 15:17

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25034/31333/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3163099
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162899
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 4.918 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53,... ): 1.969 KiB JetMET/HIJetValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 158.0 ): 0.980 KiB JetMET/HIJetValidation
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@andrius-k
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@jusaviin
Copy link
Author

backport of #24993

meJetPhi[1] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Phi_EndCap");
meJetPhi[2] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Phi_Forward");
meJetPhi[3] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"CaloJets/Phi");
//meJetPhi[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Phi");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this removable?

Suggested change
//meJetPhi[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Phi");

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd guess so. That is the pp part of the code that I did not touch in this commit (except by moving it inside the else block).

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is a backport of #24993 and that PR is already merged to master, I would prefer not to remove these commented out parts of code here either for consistency.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vargasa Do you think it is better to keep the code consistent with #24993 or remove these two lines of commented code? It does no harm to remove them from the backport if necessary.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jusaviin Please double check nothing is broken in the repo history by removing them, and if so. I'd suggest to remove them. So we can keep the code cleaner :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked that those lines have been commented out sometime in 2014. Most likely not needed ever again. I removed the lines and committed the update.

meJetEta[1] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/Eta");
meJetEta[2] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"PFJets/EtaFirst");
meJetEta[3] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+jetAlgo+"CaloJets/Eta");
//meJetEta[4] = iget_.get(newHistoName+cleaningdir+"JetPlusTrackZSPCorJetAntiKt5/Eta");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this removable?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd guess so. That is the pp part of the code that I did not touch in this commit (except by moving it inside the else block).

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is a backport of #24993 and that PR is already merged to master, I would prefer not to remove these commented out parts of code here either for consistency.

@jusaviin
Copy link
Author

jusaviin commented Nov 1, 2018

backport of #24993

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

Pull request #25034 was updated. @kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @jfernan2, @schneiml can you please check and sign again.

@andrius-k
Copy link

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31423/console Started: 2018/11/01 16:42

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25034/31423/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3163099
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3162898
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 4.918 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 158.0 ): 0.980 KiB JetMET/HIJetValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.53,... ): 1.969 KiB JetMET/HIJetValidation
  • Checked 134 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@andrius-k
Copy link

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 9, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1de877d into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_3_X Nov 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants