New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove (some) unnecessary includes from mixing #25222
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25222/7238 Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25222/7238/git-diff.patch You can run |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25222/7239 |
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages: SimGeneral/DataMixingModule @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 005fec5 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: ClangBuild
I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
See details on the summary page. |
Comparison not run due to Build errors/Fireworks only changes/No short matrix requested (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25222/7240 |
Pull request #25222 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 DQM changes look unrelated to this PR |
Tested in CMSSW_10_4_0_pre1, no changes expected.