Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sim magnetic field #25401

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 10, 2018
Merged

Sim magnetic field #25401

merged 4 commits into from Dec 10, 2018

Conversation

civanch
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch civanch commented Dec 3, 2018

Clean-up and extension of magnetic field for simulation:

  1. added possibility to use a special set of parameters for integration in magnetic field in set of geometry regions;
  2. fixed problem in initialisation printouts;
  3. defined chord finder parameters in one place of the code;
  4. clean-up simulation of monopole transportation in field;
  5. removed unused headers and obsolete comments, added improved comments.

No change in results is expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/Application
SimG4Core/MagneticField
SimG4Core/PhysicsLists

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @namapane this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Dec 3, 2018

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31954/console Started: 2018/12/03 19:54

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25401/31954/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3131839
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3131633
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Dec 4, 2018

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Dec 9, 2018

@fabiocos , this PR is only addition and technical cleanup. Such type of PRs are valid is no change is observed in regression tests.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch indeed the test does not show any difference, so we could merge it. At some point anyway we will need a larger scale test, and as we have been already reproduced the GEN-SIM in pre3 I would like to avoid redoing them multiple times in a row.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 772f26f into cms-sw:master Dec 10, 2018
forthommel pushed a commit to forthommel/cmssw that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants