Initial version of MTDTrackExtender and MTDClusterizer (#25063 squashed)

[lgray]

This is PR #25063 squashed into one commit.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[lgray]

@cmsbuild please test workflow 20434.0

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-25612/7900

• This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/EventContent
Configuration/StandardSequences
DQM/TrackingMonitor
DataFormats/FTLRecHit
DataFormats/TrackReco
DataFormats/TrackerRecHit2D
Geometry/GlobalTrackingGeometryBuilder
RecoLocalFastTime/Configuration
RecoLocalFastTime/FTLClusterizer
RecoLocalFastTime/FTLRecProducers
RecoLocalFastTime/Records
RecoMTD/Configuration
RecoMTD/DetLayers
RecoMTD/MeasurementDet
RecoMTD/TrackExtender
RecoMTD/TransientTrackingRecHit
RecoMuon/GlobalTrackingTools
RecoMuon/L3MuonProducer
RecoMuon/MuonIdentification
RecoTracker/SpecialSeedGenerators
TrackingTools/RecoGeometry
TrackingTools/TrackRefitter

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @Dr15Jones, @kmaeshima, @cvuosalo, @civanch, @fwyzard, @schneiml, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @Martin-Grunewald, @franzoni, @jfernan2, @kpedro88, @slava77, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @abbiendi, @echapon, @fioriNTU, @threus, @hdelanno, @battibass, @makortel, @jhgoh, @dgulhan, @HuguesBrun, @drkovalskyi, @trocino, @rociovilar, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @bellan, @jandrea, @mschrode, @idebruyn, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @amagitte, @Martin-Grunewald, @calderona, @bachtis, @gpetruc, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[fabiocos]

please test workflow 27634.0

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32498/console Started: 2019/01/09 17:26

[lgray]

@fabiocos thanks!

[cvuosalo]

I can approve for geometry, but I am waiting for the comparisons to complete.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25612/32499/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3153717
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3153512
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
• Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

[andrius-k]

+1

[fabiocos]

@cvuosalo it would be good if we can merge it asap, unless you have further relevant comments

@kpedro88 @slava77 @Martin-Grunewald I assume your signatures are confirmed, otherwise please comment (anyway anew signature would be useful)

[kpedro88]

+upgrade

[cvuosalo]

+1

[slava77]

+1

for #25612 f5eb812

• changes in the code are the same as in the previously signed 1st Version of MTD Hit-Finder and Track Refitter #25063 6e9e477
• jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences (the new code affects only the workflows which are not a part of the standard jenkins baseline).

[slava77]

(the new code affects only the workflows which are not a part of the standard jenkins baseline).

I'm correcting myself: the 27434 D35 WF is actually in the jenkins tests, but the default reco comparisons script is not set up to show a new collection if it's not in the baseline.

[fabiocos]

+1

@Martin-Grunewald in case please sign it for reference (as it is the same that you already signed in #25063)

[fabiocos]

merge

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.