New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversion from lowPtGsfTracks backported to 10_2_x #25761
Conversion from lowPtGsfTracks backported to 10_2_x #25761
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @nancymarinelli for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/EgammaCandidates @cmsbuild, @perrotta, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
-1 |
@perrotta @bainbrid
The fixes are on their way. I need, maybe from @bainbrid, hits about how
to go for selecting the era
…On 06/02/19 08:22, perrotta wrote:
-1
Please implement in this backport PR the same adjustments that were finally introduced in #25595, now merged in the master. Please keep in mind that in 10_2 will be produced only conditionally to the bParking era
--
________________________________________
Nancy Marinelli
Research Associate Professor
University of Notre Dame, IN, US
CERN, Bdg 40/3-A01, 1211 Geneva
SWITZERLAND
Phone +41-22-76-70809
fax +41-22-76-78940
|
…ready agreed for 10_5_X
c0a932b
to
8ab0698
Compare
backport of #25595 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
@perrotta What else is needed to be merged ? |
It will be merged for the next 10_2_X release |
+operations the backport of modifications to the StandardSequences differs from the master version in the request of being activated only for the bParking Era |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
No description provided.