Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx181 First step of making v10 HGCal geometry #26078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 11, 2019

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Mar 6, 2019

This is the post TDR geometry with reduced thickness (in cm as well as in lambda) of HGCal. Also the current partition between barrel and endcap is taken care of, the position of neutron moderator. Current ETL geometry cannot be combined with this - it will be changed soon.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26078/8636

  • This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/EcalCommonData
Geometry/HGCalCommonData
Geometry/HcalCommonData
SimG4CMS/Calo

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 6, 2019

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/33426/console Started: 2019/03/06 03:28

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 6, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26078/33426/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3114826
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3114628
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Mar 6, 2019

+upgrade

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 7, 2019

@cvuosalo @ianna @civanch Please look into this PR at the earliest. We would like to go forward with the next steps quickly

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 8, 2019

@cvuosalo Kindly approve this PR at the earliest. We need to make the new HGCal geometry available for early testing of background in the muon system

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Mar 8, 2019

+1

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 8, 2019

@civanch Could you approve this PR

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Mar 9, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda @kpedro88 in this PR a few xml files used for instance in the production scenario D35 are touched. As far as I can see there is only the addition of a parameter previously not present and not used in the code, and which I understand is supposed to leave the existing scenario untouched. Indeed the PR test shows no difference, although they are just a few events (and I am not sure about the validation coverage of HGCal). Are we sure that the old scenarios are unaffected by the changes to the algorithms?

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabiocos @kpedro88 The earlier scenarios are unaffected by the changes.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2c36177 into cms-sw:master Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants