Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pf gen jet specifics backport to 105x #26127

Closed

Conversation

rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR adds PF-like particle fractions to GenJet, at long last. The long shutdown is a good opportunity. It adds 5 floats and 5 ints to GenJet.

Addresses this issue

PR validation:

This is gen-only so I used WF 5.1.

Example of changes:

jet   4: pt  41.1, eta +1.13, energies: ch  32.69 nh   9.38 ce   0.00 ne  28.45 mu   0.00, mults: ch   7 nh   2 ce   0 ne  11 mu   0
jet   5: pt  37.4, eta +1.45, energies: ch  43.99 nh  34.36 ce   0.00 ne   6.96 mu   0.00, mults: ch  10 nh   6 ce   0 ne   2 mu   0
jet   6: pt  12.0, eta +2.78, energies: ch  93.68 nh   0.00 ce   0.00 ne   3.35 mu   0.00, mults: ch   4 nh   0 ce   0 ne   2 mu   0
jet   7: pt   9.2, eta +2.42, energies: ch  46.10 nh   6.16 ce   0.00 ne   0.00 mu  43.57, mults: ch   2 nh   1 ce   0 ne   0 mu   1

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Backport of this:

#26125

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 8, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @rappoccio for CMSSW_10_5_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/HepMCCandidate
DataFormats/JetReco
RecoJets/JetProducers

@perrotta, @efeyazgan, @perrozzi, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @alberto-sanchez, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @jdolen, @yslai, @rovere, @jdamgov, @ahinzmann, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @schoef, @mariadalfonso, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #26125

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@rappoccio

what is the use case for 10_5_X?
this release will not be used for physics analysis samples

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, yes, I didn't realize the release was shifting.

@rappoccio rappoccio closed this Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants