Removed all EgammaAnalysis packages except for ElectronTools

[guitargeek]

PR description:

As I have seen on the egamma meeting at the last CMS week, one of the plans is to get rid of some old ID code. Why not start here with these old skims and IDs? Are there used for anything @Sam-Harper?

PR validation:

Code compiles and matrix tests pass.

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26488/9343

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

EgammaAnalysis/CSA07Skims
EgammaAnalysis/Configuration
EgammaAnalysis/ElectronIDESSources
EgammaAnalysis/PhotonIDProducers
Utilities/ReleaseScripts

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @jainshilpi, @Sam-Harper, @varuns23, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[Sam-Harper]

I'm totally fine with this :D Thanks Jonas :)

[slava77]

I seem to recall that this file is supposed to contain all known packages from the past, not just the current release.

[guitargeek]

Really? I did the same thing in another PR where I removed a package:
#26186
Back then, @Dr15Jones was giving a +1 for that. So maybe I should also revert that change?

[slava77]

nevermind, I may have misunderstood/confused with another file with a list of packages.
This one is in the core signautre list anyways and will be confirmed.

[slava77]

@Sam-Harper
please confirm that the removal is OK for the POG needs.

[Sam-Harper]

Indeed it is fine by me. If anybody is actually using it, we can always recover it from git. However I very much doubt it.

In general, there is going to be a lot more of this happening for 11_X, I want to remove as much code as possible, erring on the side of removing when in doubt as we can always add it back in later.

[Dr15Jones]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34274/console Started: 2019/04/18 14:32

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: fbe00c1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26488/34274/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26488/34274/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-26488/29034.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D41_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D41+RecoFullGlobal_2023D41+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D41

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3213660
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3213455
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 204
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
• Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

[santocch]

+1

[Dr15Jones]

+1
for Utilities/ReleaseScripts

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[kpedro88]

+1