Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-gem31 Change GEMDetId in view of merging ME0 with GE1/2 #26538

Merged
merged 13 commits into from Jun 4, 2019

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

ME0 also contains GEM detectors like in GE11 and GE21. Attempt to merge the 2 DetID's ME0DetId and GEMDetId. GEMDetId will be used in all future applications

PR validation:

Standard runTheMatrix.py is run to test the changes. Also a file created in earlier production is read in with the changed GEMDetId class and tested to yield the same results

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

No back porting is needed. However any change in DetId class needs recompilation a large part of the CMSSW code

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26538/9423

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/MuonDetId

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@battibass, @trocino, @abbiendi, @jhgoh, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @drkovalskyi, @ptcox, @rovere, @folguera this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 25, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/34348/console Started: 2019/04/25 18:50

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 8d6731a

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-26538/34348/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
158.0 step3

runTheMatrix-results/158.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO/step3_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO.log

10042.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10042.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017/step3_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017.log

10024.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017.log

11624.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/11624.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2019_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2019+RecoFull_2019+HARVESTFull_2019+ALCAFull_2019/step2_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2019_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2019+RecoFull_2019+HARVESTFull_2019+ALCAFull_2019.log

10824.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10824.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+NanoFull_2018/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+NanoFull_2018.log

10224.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/10224.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2017PU+RecoFullPU_2017PU+HARVESTFullPU_2017PU/step3_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2017PU+RecoFullPU_2017PU+HARVESTFullPU_2017PU.log

250202.181 step4
runTheMatrix-results/250202.181_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25/step4_TTbar_13UP18+TTbar_13UP18+PREMIXUP18_PU25+DIGIPRMXLOCALUP18_PU25+RECOPRMXUP18_PU25+HARVESTUP18_PU25.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26538/9432

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 30, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #26944
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/600/console Started: 2019/05/30 10:32

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f2c55a/600/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 15 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3210728
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3210393
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

There are still a few differences in the reco comparisons. Are these expected?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 30, 2019

There are still a few differences in the reco comparisons. Are these expected?

these are false-positives.
The comparison script loads the old file first, which leads to incorrect reading of the new one GEM.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

+upgrade

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@civanch Please approve this PR

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented May 31, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 4, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 827b691 into cms-sw:master Jun 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet