Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx196 Handle the current issues of validation #26793

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 17, 2019

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Correct small bugs in HGCalSimHitValidation, HGCalHitStudy and HGCalHitCalibration codes

PR validation:

Tested with standard runTheMatrix

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

No back porting is required

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26793/9794

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

Validation/HGCalValidation

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vandreev11, @sethzenz, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @pfs, @kpedro88 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 15, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/240/console Started: 2019/05/15 23:42

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-498e57/240/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3212004
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 10
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211660
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

jfernan2 commented May 16, 2019

@bsunanda Your PR is only adding entries in 4 plots on Workflows
27434.0
29034.0
Is this intended?
I guess so since they are Upgrade samples but not the only ones
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-05-15-1100+498e57/31702/dqm-histo-comparison-summary.html

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes. The issues in the validation code were discussed in the DPG meeting. The issues were small: change of silicon thickness in one and empty histograms in some of the standalone code. So it will change minimally in the output - some plots will be filled up in the calibration part and that is all.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 597618e into cms-sw:master May 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants