Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove obsolete DataFormats headers #26855

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 22, 2019

Conversation

perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

The following DataFormats headers are already marked as obsolete, and since a while never included in CMSSW code:

DataFormats/BTauReco/interface/JetTracksAssociation.h
DataFormats/JetReco/interface/BasicJetfwd.h
DataFormats/JetReco/interface/CaloJetfwd.h
DataFormats/JetReco/interface/GenJetfwd.h
DataFormats/JetReco/interface/GenericJetfwd.h
DataFormats/JetReco/interface/PFJetfwd.h

They are also giving header inconsistency warnings in the code checks: removing them will silence those warnings

PR validation:

It builds

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26855/9891

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/BTauReco
DataFormats/JetReco

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jdamgov, @TaiSakuma, @rappoccio, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @ahinzmann, @smoortga, @acaudron, @nhanvtran, @rovere, @HeinerTholen, @jdolen, @mverzett, @gkasieczka, @clelange, @schoef, @ferencek, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @seemasharmafnal this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 21, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/377/console Started: 2019/05/21 15:33

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @perrotta for the cleanup

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-674bde/377/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2541 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3206828
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8155
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3198339
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

  • Technical: just removed unused headers
  • Jenkins tests show the very same differences in outputs with the baseline as for updating GT and BeamSpot for 2021 relvals #26828, whose commits were also included in these tests: I don't think we should waste time and resources in re-running the tests here because of it, given that this PR is rather trivial

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@perrotta thanks

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 138cca3 into cms-sw:master May 22, 2019
@perrotta perrotta deleted the removeObsoleteDataFormatsHeaders branch May 22, 2019 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants