New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Herwig7 fix seg fault102 #26910
Herwig7 fix seg fault102 #26910
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @Andrej-CMS for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Generator @alberto-sanchez, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @agrohsje, @efeyazgan can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@efeyazgan @qliphy @Andrej-CMS which is the level of validation of this fix? Before putting it in production I think we need to ensure it is behaving correctly in master, what was done so far about this, besides checking that it runs smoothly from the technical point fo view? |
@efeyazgan @qliphy |
please test workflow 535 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
Although as shown with "comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:", Andrej has already checked locally, as mentioned in #26905 |
+1 |
@qliphy |
+1 |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport of #26905