New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running code-format for reconstruction #27069
Conversation
please test |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27069/10155
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master. It involves the following packages: DataFormats/EcalRecHit @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Comparison job queued. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few cases that could be addressed later
float jitter_; //< Reconstructed time jitter | ||
float chi2_; //< Chi2 of the pulse | ||
float OOTamplitudes_ | ||
[EcalDataFrame::MAXSAMPLES]; //< Out-Of-Time reconstructed amplitude, one for each active BX, from readout sample 0 to 9 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move the comment instead of breaking the code line
const double CaloPoint::depth = 0.1; // one for all relative depth of the reference point between ECAL begin and HCAL end | ||
const double CaloPoint::R_BARREL = (1.-depth)*143.+depth*407.; | ||
const double CaloPoint::depth = | ||
0.1; // one for all relative depth of the reference point between ECAL begin and HCAL end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move the comment; not break code line
/// track quality | ||
uint8_t quality_; | ||
|
||
/// number of loops made during the building of the trajectory of a looper particle | ||
signed char nLoops_; // I use signed char because I don't expect more than 128 loops and I could use a negative value for a special purpose. | ||
signed char | ||
nLoops_; // I use signed char because I don't expect more than 128 loops and I could use a negative value for a special purpose. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
move the comment
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 I could not find the failing test |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Applying code-format for CMSSW category reconstruction.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/345//console
cms-bot has successfully run the following: