Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running code-format for reconstruction #27069

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 4, 2019

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

Applying code-format for CMSSW category reconstruction.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/345//console

cms-bot has successfully run the following:

  • scram build code-checks-all
  • scram build code-format-all
  • scram build

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27069/10155

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/707/console Started: 2019/06/03 05:54

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/EcalRecHit
DataFormats/JetReco
DataFormats/ParticleFlowCandidate
DataFormats/RecoCandidate
DataFormats/TrackReco
DataFormats/TrackerRecHit2D
RecoParticleFlow/Configuration

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @hatakeyamak, @rappoccio, @argiro, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @makortel, @lgray, @jdolen, @rovere, @VinInn, @jdamgov, @nhanvtran, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @clelange, @ahinzmann, @cbernet, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

-1

Tested at: 0f65aee

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17128e/707/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

Comparison job queued.

Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a few cases that could be addressed later

float jitter_; //< Reconstructed time jitter
float chi2_; //< Chi2 of the pulse
float OOTamplitudes_
[EcalDataFrame::MAXSAMPLES]; //< Out-Of-Time reconstructed amplitude, one for each active BX, from readout sample 0 to 9
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

move the comment instead of breaking the code line

const double CaloPoint::depth = 0.1; // one for all relative depth of the reference point between ECAL begin and HCAL end
const double CaloPoint::R_BARREL = (1.-depth)*143.+depth*407.;
const double CaloPoint::depth =
0.1; // one for all relative depth of the reference point between ECAL begin and HCAL end
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

move the comment; not break code line

/// track quality
uint8_t quality_;

/// number of loops made during the building of the trajectory of a looper particle
signed char nLoops_; // I use signed char because I don't expect more than 128 loops and I could use a negative value for a special purpose.
signed char
nLoops_; // I use signed char because I don't expect more than 128 loops and I could use a negative value for a special purpose.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

move the comment

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17128e/707/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3210678
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3210343
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 3, 2019

+1

for #27069 0f65aee

  • technical
  • jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 3, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 4, 2019

+1

I could not find the failing test

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Jun 4, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/737/console Started: 2019/06/04 10:36

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17128e/737/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3210222
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3209887
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants