Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of SiPixel quality harvester for Ultra legacy #27130

Merged
merged 27 commits into from Jun 13, 2019

Conversation

tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

@tocheng tocheng commented Jun 6, 2019

PR description:

The PR is to update pixel quality harvester for Run-2 ultra legacy

PR validation:

The PR update the bad ROC tagging by

  • using per-layer for Bpix / per-ring for Fpix average digi occupancy instead of average occupancy over the full detector
  • using layer/ring dependent fraction threshold to apply the optimized pixel quality tagging
  • further reduce redundant payloads

Pixel quality tagging are optimized with layer/ring dependent thresholds with pixel offline group.

No effect on CMSSW standard workflows.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

This is backport of PR #27050

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

tocheng added 27 commits June 6, 2019 21:53
…mpt payload = permanent bad components, other payload = empty

This reverts commit f12202d.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @tocheng (Tongguang) for CMSSW_10_6_X.

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiPixelQuality

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @dkotlins, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Jun 6, 2019

backport #27050

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Jun 6, 2019

@cmsbuild please test workflow 1001.2, 1040

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/807/console Started: 2019/06/06 22:13

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f97cb3/807/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-f97cb3/1001.2_RunZeroBias2017F+RunZeroBias2017F+TIER0EXPRUN2+ALCAEXPRUN2+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-f97cb3/1040.0_RunZeroBias2017F+RunZeroBias2017F+TIER0RAWSIPIXELCAL+ALCASPLITSIPIXELCAL+ALCAHARVDSIPIXELCAL

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3206400
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3206064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Jun 7, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 0cb5aec into cms-sw:CMSSW_10_6_X Jun 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants