Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running code-format for reconstruction #27233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 18, 2019

Conversation

cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Applying code-format for CMSSW category reconstruction.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/402//console

cms-bot has successfully run the following:

  • scram build code-checks-all
  • scram build code-format-all
  • scram build

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27233/10418

  • This PR adds an extra 8KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

cmsbuild commented Jun 18, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/998/console Started: 2019/06/18 07:01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/EgammaCandidates

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jainshilpi, @Sam-Harper, @varuns23, @rovere, @lgray this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison job queued.

math::XYZPointF positionAtVtx; // the track PCA to the beam spot
math::XYZPointF positionAtCalo; // the track PCA to the supercluster position
math::XYZVectorF momentumAtVtx; // the track momentum at the PCA to the beam spot
math::XYZVectorF
Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta perrotta Jun 18, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to notice a few line splits because of a comment at the end of the line.
I am not personally particularly against them here, though

float sumEcalClusterEt; //sum pt of ecal clusters, vetoing clusters part of photon
float sumHcalClusterEt; //sum pt of hcal clusters, vetoing clusters part of photon
PflowIsolationVariables()
:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kind of funny adjustment here...

const std::vector<math::XYZVectorF>& trackPout,
const float mva,
ConversionAlgorithm algo)
:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

uint8_t nSharedHits,
const float mva,
ConversionAlgorithm algo)
:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11358e/998/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3254096
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3253760
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 163635c into master Jun 18, 2019
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the code-format-reconstruction-cd073e branch June 20, 2019 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants