Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sim G4 Geometry from dd4hep Tracked Flag #27295

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

ianna
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna ianna commented Jun 20, 2019

PR description:

  • Track g4GeometryDD4hepSource parameter
  • Clean up DDDWorld API

PR validation:

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Jun 20, 2019

@fabiocos - FYI

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27295/10510

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ianna (Ianna Osborne) for master.

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/Application
SimG4Core/Geometry

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor Author

ianna commented Jun 20, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 20, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1085/console Started: 2019/06/20 23:00

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-eb8b0d/1085/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3254096
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3253760
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 21, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna thank you, I think this can be helpful in the transition period to avoid possible misconfigurations difficult to track

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit f7d3840 into cms-sw:master Jun 21, 2019
@@ -29,6 +27,7 @@ class DDDWorld {
G4VPhysicalVolume *GetWorldVolumeForWorker() const { return m_world; }

private:
void SetAsWorld(G4VPhysicalVolume *pv);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ianna @civanch the idea behind removing the static declaration is that in any case this is called only at initialization level, before the event chain?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes. It's DDDWorld self-initialisation - the method became private.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants