New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove localDensity from the EventContent for HGCAL #27418
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27418/10715
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rovere (Marco Rovere) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoLocalCalo/Configuration @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
'keep *_hgcalMultiClusters_*_*', | ||
'keep *_iterHGCalMultiClusters_*_*'] ) | ||
# don't modify AOD for HGCal yet, need "reduced" rechits collection first (i.e. requires reconstruction) | ||
phase2_hgcal.toModify( RecoLocalCaloAOD, outputCommands = RecoLocalCaloAOD.outputCommands + ['keep *_HGCalRecHit_*_*','keep *_hgcalLayerClusters_*_*'] ) | ||
phase2_hgcal.toModify( RecoLocalCaloAOD, outputCommands = RecoLocalCaloAOD.outputCommands + ['keep *_HGCalRecHit_*_*','keep *_hgcalLayerClusters_*_*','drop DetIdfloatstdmap_hgcalLayerClusters_*_*']) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please add some linebreaks here so that this long line fits on the screen (as multiple lines)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rovere
ping
in case this got lost
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27418/10774
|
@cmsbuild please test workflow 29093.52 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Drop the local density map used internally by the CLUE algorithm from the EventContent.
PR validation:
Tested with Phase2 workflows in runTheMatrix.