New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove GENREFLEX_ARGS flag #27655
remove GENREFLEX_ARGS flag #27655
Conversation
please test |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27655/11201
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master. It involves the following packages: CondCore/CondDB @cmsbuild, @benkrikler, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @fwyzard, @christopheralanwest, @andrius-k, @tocheng, @Martin-Grunewald, @rekovic, @franzoni, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU, @tlampen, @ggovi, @pohsun, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Tested at: 04898a0 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test ExpressionEvaluatorUnitTest had ERRORS |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@VinInn , recently we have noticed the unit test Can you please look in to it and provide a fix? [a]
|
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
@fabiocos , can we get this in? This is just a technical change to cleanup BuildFiles. This flag in BuildFile is useless after the merge of cms-sw/cmsdist#5110 |
@smuzaffar this looks quite straightforward, I will by-pass the signatures. Just one question; you are dropping this flag from all the BuildFiles where it is present, what about https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/Utilities/ReleaseScripts/python/cmsCodeRules/config.py#0190 ? Do we still need GENREFLEX_ARGS here at this point? |
+1 |
merge |
@fabiocos , we need to keep https://cmssdt.cern.ch/lxr/source/Utilities/ReleaseScripts/python/cmsCodeRules/config.py#0190 . GENREFLEX_ARGS is valid BuildFile flag to provide extra command line arguments for genreflex and we want cmsCodeRule to still ignore it if it is found in BuildFile but |
+1 |
@VinInn can you please look in to this #27655 (comment) ? #27723 will fix. |
PR description:
Cleanup
GENREFLEX_ARGS="--"
flag from BuildFiles. It was only dropping the--deep
flag for genreflex. As--deep
is not supported by genreflex/rootcling any more ( cms-sw/cmsdist@b9f88fe ) , we propose to cleanup our BuildFiles too.PR validation:
local compilation was successful