New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Filtering on pixel and strip clusters #27871
Filtering on pixel and strip clusters #27871
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27871/11626
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rchudasa for master. It involves the following packages: RecoTracker/TkSeedGenerator @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
from Configuration.ProcessModifiers.egamma_lowPt_exclusive_cff import egamma_lowPt_exclusive | ||
egamma_lowPt_exclusive.toModify(trackerClusterCheck, | ||
doClusterCheck=True, | ||
cut = "strip < 1000 && pixel < 300 && (strip < 50000 + 10*pixel) && (pixel < 5000 + 0.1*strip)", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aren't the third and fourth conditions in AND already included in the first two?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree.
@rchudasa please remove unnecessary parts of the cut
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27871/11629
|
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
@echapon @slava77
This PR is submitted to filter out events with large activity in Pixel and Strip clusters for light by light analysis. The filtering reduces the timing of the reconstruction process by significant amount. The results has been presented in Reconstruction and Analysis Tools meeting.
https://indico.cern.ch/event/841640/contributions/3534139/attachments/1896758/3129554/CMS_Reco_23rdAug_2019.pdf