New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a data based relval test wf with lumi boundary crossing #27937
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27937/11778
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @cmsbuild, @prebello, @chayanit, @zhenhu, @kpedro88, @pgunnell can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@@ -478,6 +482,10 @@ | |||
### LS2 - MWGR ### | |||
steps['RunCosmics2019']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/ExpressCosmics/Commissioning2019-Express-v1/FEVT',label='2019GR3',run=[330098],events=100000,location='STD')} | |||
|
|||
#### Test of lumi section boundary crossing with run2 2018D #### | |||
Run2018Dml={320822: [[1,1]] , 320823: [[1,1]]} | |||
steps['RunEGamma2018Dml']={'INPUT':InputInfo(dataSet='/EGamma/Run2018D-v1/RAW',label='2018D',events=100000,location='STD', ls=Run2018Dml)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This leads to run boundary (between runs 320822 and 320823) in addition to lumi boundary, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I am working to a revised version that adds a lumi boundary only workflow
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27937/11795
|
please test workflow 136.8861,136.8862 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
New test wfs 136.8861 and 136.8862 (EGamma Run2018D) are proposed, expanding 136.886 with instructions to force a lumi boundary crossing within a short (100 events) run, and enabling
nConcurrentlumis
as discussed in #26348 . One test uses two lumi sections from different runs, while the other lumi sections from the same run. These tests are supposed to serve developments like those proposed by the Core FWK team in #26592.PR validation:
The wf 136.8861 and 136.8862 run till the end.