Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New plugin module to convert GenParticles to HepMC format for Rivet analysis #281

Merged

Conversation

jhgoh
Copy link
Contributor

@jhgoh jhgoh commented Aug 12, 2013

New plugins module to do Rivet analysis with AODSIM data.
This module reproduces HepMC referring genParticles.

See
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/RivetontoAODSIM
for overall information and links,
and
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/GenParticles2HepMCConverter
for full documentation of this module.

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Aug 12, 2013

@vciulli can you check and eventually approve? @nclopezo can you run the tests? Thanks.

@ghost ghost assigned vciulli Aug 12, 2013
@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I tested these changes on top of CMSSW_7_0_0_pre2. All tests passed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The following categories have been signed by ciulli (a.k.a. @vciulli on GitHub): Generators

@cms-git-generators

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2013
…HepMCConverter

New plugin module to convert GenParticles to HepMC format for Rivet analysis
@ktf ktf merged commit 6ce5b20 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_X Aug 19, 2013
@jhgoh jhgoh deleted the jhgoh-RivetInterface-GenParticles2HepMCConverter branch August 19, 2013 08:33
makortel pushed a commit to makortel/cmssw that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2015
veelken pushed a commit to veelken/cmssw that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
Update ttH hadronic HLT path names
abaty pushed a commit to abaty/cmssw that referenced this pull request May 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants