Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconfigure particle flow config files #28110

Merged
merged 40 commits into from Nov 4, 2019

Conversation

hatakeyamak
Copy link
Contributor

@hatakeyamak hatakeyamak commented Oct 3, 2019

PR description:

Reconfigure particleFlow_cfi and make clear the parameters used for PFEGammaFilters, PFMuonAlgo, i.e. different components of PFAlgo. Also used this opportunity to remove obsolete config parameters.

This is a follow-up of
#27782
and fillDescriptions are introduced, and reduced ParameterSets use a little bit wrt PR27782

PR validation:

Compiles and run a few matrix tests with success (scenarios for 2017, 2018, and phase2)

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

This is not a backport PR.

@bendavid @jpata @guitargeek

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@hatakeyamak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually, this will fail the jenkins tests that runs HLT. I am not familiar with what to do to update HLTrigger/Configuration/python/HLT_GRun_cff.py reflecting the changes here, and suggestions will be appreciated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28110/12125

  • This PR adds an extra 208KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @hatakeyamak (Kenichi Hatakeyama) for master.

It involves the following packages:

RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @bachtis, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 3, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2776/console Started: 2019/10/03 16:31

pfmu_ = std::unique_ptr<PFMuonAlgo>(new PFMuonAlgo(conf));
bool postMuonCleaning =
conf.existsAs<bool>("postMuonCleaning") ? conf.getParameter<bool>("postMuonCleaning") : false;
pfmu_ = std::unique_ptr<PFMuonAlgo>(new PFMuonAlgo(conf, postMuonCleaning));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this existsAs needed here (and in some other locations) if the parameter is part of fillDescriptions ayway?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking a look. This comes from PFBlockProducer.cc (not PFProducer.cc) for which we haven't introduced fillDescriptions yet...

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

-1

Tested at: 5ea0bf6

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f6d58/2776/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals AddOn

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
140.56 step2

runTheMatrix-results/140.56_RunHI2018+RunHI2018+RECOHID18+HARVESTDHI18/step2_RunHI2018+RunHI2018+RECOHID18+HARVESTDHI18.log

158.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/158.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO/step2_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO.log

11634.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/11634.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021/step2_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2021_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2021+RecoFull_2021+HARVESTFull_2021+ALCAFull_2021.log

12434.0 step2
runTheMatrix-results/12434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2023+RecoFull_2023+HARVESTFull_2023+ALCAFull_2023/step2_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2023+RecoFull_2023+HARVESTFull_2023+ALCAFull_2023.log

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-10-02-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_HIon.py realData=True globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:24:35 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:23 2019 s - exit: 18688
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:HIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_HIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2018_pp_on_AA --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:24:35 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:23 2019 s - exit: 256
cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-10-02-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_GRun.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:30:20 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:26 2019 s - exit: 18688
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:GRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --mc --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_mc_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run3 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_MC.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_MC_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:30:20 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:26 2019 s - exit: 18688
cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-10-02-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_HIon.py realData=False globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:29:17 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:48 2019 s - exit: 18688
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:HIon,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --mc --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_mc_HIon --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2018_pp_on_AA --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_MC.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_HIon_MC_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:29:17 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:23:48 2019 s - exit: 256
cmsRun /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week0/slc7_amd64_gcc820/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-10-02-2300/src/HLTrigger/Configuration/test/OnLine_HLT_GRun.py realData=True globalTag=@ inputFiles=@ : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:29:24 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:24:02 2019 s - exit: 18688
cmsDriver.py RelVal -s HLT:GRun,RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO --data --scenario=pp -n 10 --conditions auto:run2_data_GRun --relval 9000,50 --datatier "RAW-HLT-RECO" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --era Run2_2018 --processName=HLTRECO --filein file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA.root --fileout file:RelVal_Raw_GRun_DATA_HLT_RECO.root : FAILED - time: date Thu Oct 3 17:29:24 2019-date Thu Oct 3 17:24:02 2019 s - exit: 18688

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2019

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #28110 was updated. @perrotta, @Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@hatakeyamak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @fabiocos . I think I solved the conflict.
Does this PR look good now, reviewers?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 30, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 30, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/3254/console Started: 2019/10/30 15:07

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f6d58/3254/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961036
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960694
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 1, 2019

+1

for #28110 6756673

  • code changes are in line with the PR description and the follow up review
    • I only inspected the value changes from the code diffs, additionally relying on lack of differences in the results
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no differences

@hatakeyamak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @slava77.
Looks like this is still waiting for HLT signature. @fwyzard @Martin-Grunewald

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 4, 2019

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants