Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tau pog tags to GTs #28134

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 18, 2019
Merged

Add tau pog tags to GTs #28134

merged 2 commits into from Oct 18, 2019

Conversation

tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

@tocheng tocheng commented Oct 9, 2019

PR description:

The PR is to PR 28063 support tau ID at nanoAOD level. 75 labeled tags are added to data/MC tags to support tau ID calculation.
No effect on physics performance is expect when testing this PR alone.

GT diffs:
Data offline GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_dataRun2_v8/110X_dataRun2_v7
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_dataRun2_relval_v8/110X_dataRun2_relval_v7

Data prompt-like GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_v7/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_v6
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_HEfail_v7/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_HEfail_v8
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_HI_v7/110X_dataRun2_PromptLike_HI_v6

Run-1 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun1_design_v2/110X_mcRun1_design_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun1_realistic_v2/110X_mcRun1_realistic_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun1_HeavyIon_v2/110X_mcRun1_HeavyIon_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun1_pA_v2/110X_mcRun1_pA_v1

2015 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_startup_v2/110X_mcRun2_startup_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_asymptotic_l1stage1_v2/110X_mcRun2_asymptotic_l1stage1_v1

2016 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_design_v3/110X_mcRun2_design_v2
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v3/110X_mcRun2_asymptotic_v2
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_HeavyIon_v2/110X_mcRun2_HeavyIon_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun2_pA_v3/110X_mcRun2_pA_v2

2017 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mc2017_design_v2/110X_mc2017_design_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mc2017_realistic_v2/110X_mc2017_realistic_v1

2018 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_upgrade2018_design_v2/110X_upgrade2018_design_v1
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_upgrade2018_realistic_v6/110X_upgrade2018_realistic_v5
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_upgrade2018_realistic_HI_v5/110X_upgrade2018_realistic_HI_v4

Run 3 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun3_2021_design_v4/110X_mcRun3_2021_design_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v4/110X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v4/110X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v3
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v4/110X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v3

Run 4 MC GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/110X_mcRun4_realistic_v2/110X_mcRun4_realistic_v1

PR validation:

See the description above for the physics validation of the tags.

In addition, a technical test was performed: runTheMatrix.py -l limited -i all --ibeos

PR validation:

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28134/12182

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @tocheng (Tongguang) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Oct 9, 2019

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2846/console Started: 2019/10/09 12:18

@tocheng tocheng changed the title Add tau pog tags Add tau pog tags to GTs Oct 9, 2019
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #28063
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2850/console Started: 2019/10/09 15:44

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0e7989/2846/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961052
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960707
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

-1

Tested at: 16a85d8

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1874cc/2850/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
1330.0 step5

runTheMatrix-results/1330.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15_L1TMuDQM+HARVESTUP15_L1TMuDQM+NANOUP15/step5_ZMM_13+ZMM_13+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15_L1TMuDQM+HARVESTUP15_L1TMuDQM+NANOUP15.log

158.0 step3
runTheMatrix-results/158.0_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO/step3_HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+HydjetQ_B12_5020GeV_2018_ppReco+DIGIHI2018PPRECO+RECOHI2018PPRECO+ALCARECOHI2018PPRECO+HARVESTHI2018PPRECO.log

10042.0 step6
runTheMatrix-results/10042.0_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+NanoFull_2017/step6_ZMM_13+ZMM_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+NanoFull_2017.log

25202.0 step5
runTheMatrix-results/25202.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13+DIGIUP15_PU25+RECOUP15_PU25+HARVESTUP15_PU25+NANOUP15_PU25.log

10024.0 step6
runTheMatrix-results/10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+NanoFull_2017/step6_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+NanoFull_2017.log

10824.0 step6
runTheMatrix-results/10824.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+NanoFull_2018/step6_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2018_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2018+RecoFull_2018+HARVESTFull_2018+ALCAFull_2018+NanoFull_2018.log

10224.0 step5
runTheMatrix-results/10224.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2017PU+RecoFullPU_2017PU+HARVESTFullPU_2017PU+NanoFull_2017PU/step5_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017PU_GenSimFull+DigiFullPU_2017PU+RecoFullPU_2017PU+HARVESTFullPU_2017PU+NanoFull_2017PU.log

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Oct 16, 2019

@fabiocos I rebased the commit to the lastest IB 2019-10-15-2300 yesterday. And now there is a unit test error due to alignment which should not be relevant to this PR. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0e7989/2981/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960719
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

please test with #28063

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 16, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) #28063
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2995/console Started: 2019/10/16 21:59

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ca9ac3/2995/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 2448 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960718
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@tocheng @christopheralanwest I understand that #28063 is dependent on this PR, but is the opposite true? Do I understand correctly that in this PR new tags are added? And why do we see changes in old run1 tests? What does change in conditions for this old runs?

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

tocheng commented Oct 18, 2019

@fabiocos I don't think this PR depends on #28063 .
The change in run1 is because the deprecated MVA IDs are removed.
See the comments in the PR:
#28063 (comment)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants