Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate SiPixelGenErrorDBObjectESProducer and SiPixelTemplateDBObjectESProducer to EventSetup consumes #28142

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented Oct 9, 2019

PR description:

This PR is an updated version of #27043 to migrate SiPixelGenErrorDBObjectESProducer and SiPixelTemplateDBObjectESProducer to EventSetup consumes (as part of #26748) using the recently-introduced "mayConsume" functionality.

PR validation:

Code compiles, limited matrix runs.

@Dr15Jones

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28142/12188

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibTracker/SiPixelESProducers

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @dkotlins, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

makortel commented Oct 9, 2019

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2855/console Started: 2019/10/09 19:58

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

makortel commented Oct 9, 2019

I couldn't avoid noticing that the two files are almost exact copies differing only with the product and record types. The copy paste could be easily avoided with templates. If the DPG likes, I can do that.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 9, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9aa232/2855/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961056
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960714
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich I believe the comment #28142 (comment) by @makortel is for you

@christopheralanwest @pohsun could you please check the PR?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 11, 2019

@fabiocos, @makortel, if I have to cast my vote, I would prefer to keep things like they are, for the sake of intuition of what each producer is actually doing (at the cost of a slight code duplication).
Maybe @tsusa or @pmaksim1 have different opinions and can voice them.

@tlampen
Copy link
Contributor

tlampen commented Oct 11, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabiocos, @makortel, if I have to cast my vote, I would prefer to keep things like they are, for the sake of intuition of what each producer is actually doing (at the cost of a slight code duplication).
Maybe @tsusa or @pmaksim1 have different opinions and can voice them.

Ok, that's fine.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 3c1761d into cms-sw:master Oct 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants