Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix case of enums to match db #28186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 16, 2019
Merged

fix case of enums to match db #28186

merged 1 commit into from Oct 16, 2019

Conversation

davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Fixes unit test failures introduced in #28157

PR validation:

Affected unit tests now work

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test
@fabiocos , this seems to fix the unit tests, so I would suggest to merge it for 11h00 (even if PR tests do not finish) or we can delay the 11h Ib for an hour.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28186/12274

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 16, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2971/console Started: 2019/10/16 10:16

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/Utilities

@ggovi, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 @smuzaffar so I keep my revert commit https://github.com/fabiocos/cmssw/tree/fc-revert28157 on hold, assuming this further fix can take care of all the issues.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlange6 commented Oct 16, 2019 via email

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 I agreed with @smuzaffar to hold the IB for a little, he is running a set of tests, then we will merge and have an IB just for this

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

smuzaffar commented Oct 16, 2019

I have tested locally and not all the unit tests passed [a] but it is much better now. I would suggest to merge it before 12h and start IB

[a]

---> test EcalTPGPhysicsConst_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainEBIdMap_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGWeightIdMap_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGLutIdMap_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGPedestals_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalDCS_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalADCToGeV_update_test succeeded
---> test EcalIntercalibConstants_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalLaser_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainEBGroup_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainTowerEE_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGFineGrainStripEE_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGSpike_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGLutGroup_O2O_test succeeded
---> test testPngHistograms succeeded
---> test EcalTPGTowerStatus_O2O_test succeeded
---> test testHistograms succeeded
---> test testBasicPayload succeeded
---> test test_CreateFileLists had ERRORS
---> test EcalTPGCrystalStatus_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGSlidingWindow_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGWeightGroup_O2O_test succeeded
---> test EcalTPGLinearizationConst_O2O_test succeeded
---> test test_PrepareInputDb succeeded
---> test EcalTPGBadStripStatus_O2O_test succeeded
---> test SiStripDCS_O2O_test had ERRORS
---> test RunInfoStart_O2O_test succeeded
---> test test_MpsWorkFlow succeeded
---> test SiStripDAQ_O2O_test succeeded

      6 ERRORS
     24 succeeded

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar I agree, it does not look as the final solution, but it definitely improves the situation

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

merge

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 1b741f6 into cms-sw:master Oct 16, 2019
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@fabiocos you want to merge any thing else or should I start the IB now.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-fc8032/2971/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2961064
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2960722
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants