Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redefine (in)valid GEM digis and pads #28335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 4, 2019
Merged

Redefine (in)valid GEM digis and pads #28335

merged 1 commit into from Nov 4, 2019

Conversation

dildick
Copy link
Contributor

@dildick dildick commented Nov 1, 2019

PR description:

PR #24356 reset the begin pad as 0 instead of 1. This broke a function in the GEM-CSC trigger. To fix it, I redefine when strips, pads and clusters are valid. Default strips/pads are now initialized with bx -99 and strip/pad number 2^16-1.

PR validation:

I checked that it runs with WF 22034.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

N/A

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2019

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2019

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28335/12598

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2019

A new Pull Request was created by @dildick (Sven Dildick) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/GEMDigi

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @kpedro88, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@jshlee, @rovere this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 2, 2019

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/3316/console Started: 2019/11/02 19:27

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2019

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2019

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 2, 2019

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7a6b1a/3316/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2939026
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2938683
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Nov 4, 2019

+upgrade

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Nov 4, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 4, 2019

@dildick are we sure this does not interfere with existing datasets? I mean that these values cannot be assumed by old good data, and therefore their state of being good is unchanged?

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 4, 2019

@fabiocos Correct. GEM BX value is 0 for in-time hits, while the GEM strip number is maximum 768.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

fabiocos commented Nov 4, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit ee77a3c into cms-sw:master Nov 4, 2019
@dildick dildick deleted the from-CMSSW_11_0_X_2019-11-01-1100-redefine-GEM-digis branch November 18, 2019 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants