New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MTD reco geometry: preliminary cleaning #28875
Conversation
… remove code ported from tracker but unused by MTD, move testGeometry into more appropriate location, restore original GeometricTimingDet
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28875/13649
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28875/13650
|
A new Pull Request was created by @fabiocos (Fabio Cossutti) for master. It involves the following packages: DetectorDescription/DDCMS @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@@ -90,20 +92,29 @@ void MTDTopologyAnalyzer::analyze(const edm::Event& iEvent, const edm::EventSetu | |||
|
|||
size_t num = fv.geoHistory().size(); | |||
|
|||
if (fv.geoHistory()[num - 1].logicalPart().name() == "BarrelTimingLayer") { | |||
if (fv.geoHistory()[num - 1].logicalPart().name().name() == "BarrelTimingLayer") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
please test workflow 23434.1001 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR proposes a preliminary cleaning of the
Geometry/MTDNumberingBuilder
andGeometry/MTDGeometryBuilder
in view of the migration to DD4hep and insertion of the new TRD ETL. The DD4hepDDFilteredView
is updated by adding a methodcopyNumbers
that has the same meaning as in DDD.The
GeometricTimingDetAnalyzer
has also been revisited in order to provide a detailed dump of the product of the MTDNumberingBuilder and serve for comparisons in the rewriting of this component.PR validation:
The old tests run on scenario D50 without issues, and now the printout in
MTDTopologyAnalyzer
is fixed (previously partially not working).